Live record · within 100 km (62 mi) · M2.5+
Earthquakes near Vedder Crossing
In the last 30 days there were 0 earthquakes of magnitude 2.5 or larger within 100 km (62 mi) of Vedder Crossing, British Columbia, and 0 in the last 24 hours. None was recorded in that period.
Earthquakes M2.5+ within 100 km
- Last 24 hours0
- Last 7 days0
- Last 30 days0
- Last year8
- Last 5 years29
M1+ in the last 7 days: 2. Methodology
01 — History
Earthquakes per month near Vedder Crossing
15 earthquakes of magnitude 2.5 or larger within 100 km of Vedder Crossing in the last 24 months. The busiest month was Jun 2025, with 3.
02 — Recent
Recent earthquakes near Vedder Crossing
No earthquakes in this window
Nothing at this magnitude was recorded here in this period. Quiet stretches are normal for most places.
03 — Questions
Earthquakes in Vedder Crossing, answered
Was there an earthquake in Vedder Crossing today?
No earthquake of magnitude 2.5 or larger was recorded within 100 km of Vedder Crossing in the last 24 hours. Smaller ones can still occur. The home page lists them when you choose “All” magnitudes.
Are earthquakes common near Vedder Crossing?
Over the last five years there were 29 earthquakes of magnitude 2.5 or larger within 100 km of Vedder Crossing, an average of 5.8 a year. 8 occurred in the last 12 months. That is 38% above the five-year average.
What was the largest earthquake near Vedder Crossing in five years?
A magnitude 4.5 on Mar 3, 2025, 13:02 UTC, 82 km (51 mi) SW of Vedder Crossing, at a depth of 16 km. See this earthquake
Counts describe past activity within 100 km of the city centre. They are not a forecast or a risk assessment. Data updated . Source: USGS.
04 — Embed
Put this on your website
Show a live version of this report on your own site. It’s free, updates every two minutes and links back here. How the widget works.
<iframe src="https://quakewatch.beer/embed/ca/british-columbia/vedder-crossing" width="360" height="430" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Recent earthquakes near Vedder Crossing"></iframe>